The appellant sought condonation of a 377-day delay in filing an appeal. The Bench held that delay cannot be condoned in light of a previous judgment of the Court and dismissed the Civil Application.
Civil Application dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
1
CAO20.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2012 IN
FERA APPEAL (ST) NO. 17992 OF 2012
The Union of India
..... Appellant
Versus
Vinod Lath
..... Respondent
Mr. R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel with Mr. A.S. Rao for the appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
R.D. DHANUKA, JJ. DATE : 6 th SEPTEMBER, 2012.
P.C. :
By this Civil Application, the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 377
days in filing the appeal. In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Union
of India Vs. M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. 2012(3) ALL MR 93 , the counsel for
the Revenue fairly concedes that the delay can not be condoned. In this view of the matter, Civil Application is dismissed.
(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 377 days in filing the appeal can be condoned.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India Vs. M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd.Referred¶19
Union of India Vs. M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. 2012(3) ALL MR 93
The Union of India
Vinod Lath
J.P. Devadhar
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
J.P. Devadhar and R.D. Dhanuka
Parties & counsel
