Appeal against CESTAT order quashed per Apex Court judgment; matter restored to CESTAT for fresh consideration.
CESTAT order quashed and matter restored to CESTAT for fresh consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cexa85-12
agk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.85 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane – I ..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Jay Art ..Respondent.
Mr.Pradeep S Jetly with Mr.J.B. Mishra for the appellant. Mr.Vipin Jain with Mr.Rajeev Ravi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.D. Dhanuka, JJ. DATE : 5th September 2012
P.C. :
1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Craft Interiors Private Limited V/s. Commissioner of Central ExciseReferred¶12
2006 (203) E.L.T. 529 (S.C.)
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane – I
M/s.Jay Art
J.P. Devadhar
R.D. Dhanuka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
