C.A.W. disposed without interim relief, allowing petitioner to take further legal steps. No substantive legal principle elaborated; procedural final order.
Disposed with liberty to petitioner to take such steps as are open to him in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2301caw165.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
C. A. W. NO. 165 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2827 OF 2010
Kishor Bhauraoji Giri Vs. Dy. Inspector General of Police New Delhi & Ors.
........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Shri B. M. Khan Adv for petitioner. Shri S. K. Mishra Adv for respondents.
CORAM: B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & P. D. KODE JJ.
DATED: 23 JANUARY, 2012. .
It is apparent that there cannot be any interim
reinstatement which is final relief in the petition. Hence with liberty to petitioner to take such steps as are open to him in law, we dispose of this civil application.
JUDGE JUDGE
svk
Kishor Bhauraoji Giri
Dy. Inspector General of Police New Delhi
B. P. DHARMADHIKARI
P. D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
