This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
32.cas.317.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 317 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1066 OF 2012
Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Sawantwadi, Through the Secretary, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Versus Shri. Gurunath Sakharam Narvekar and others
....Applicant.
....Respondents.
Mr. S. M. Sabrad for the Applicant.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 6, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. Though the Respondents are duly served, no one appeared on their behalf when the matter was called out.
S. S. MORMARE
1 of 2
2
32.cas.317.12
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads thus:
(K. K. TATED, J.)
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Sawantwadi, Through the Secretary, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
Shri. Gurunath Sakharam Narvekar
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
