The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant's civil application for condonation of a six-day delay in preferring a second appeal. The respondent did not appear.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
29.cas.314.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 314 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST.) NO. 1075 OF 2012
Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Sawantwadi, Through the Secretary, Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Versus Jahirabai Gaus Mohamad Khanapuri and others
....Applicant.
....Respondents.
Mr. S. M. Sabrad for the Applicant.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 6, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. Though the Respondents are duly served, no one appeared on their behalf when the matter was called out.
S. S. MORMARE
1 of 2
2
29.cas.314.12
Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads thus:
(K. K. TATED, J.)
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a delay of six days in filing a second appeal can be condoned in the interest of justice.
Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Sawantwadi
Jahirabai Gaus Mohamad Khanapuri
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
