A single-judge bench of the Bombay High Court disposed of a civil application filed by an original plaintiff seeking condonation of a 170-day delay in filing an appeal against a lower court's judgment and decree dismissing their suit.
Condonation of 170 days delay in filing the appeal and permission to hear the appeal on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
7.caf.96.04
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2004 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 238 OF 2004
Manik Vishnu Bhatte ....Applicant. Versus
Bhagashri L. Ranganaiky ....Respondent.
Mr. N. V. Khaladkar i/b P. S. Dani for the Applicant. Mr. Ashutosh Singh i/b H. S. S. Murthy for the Respondent.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : MAY 9, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
parties.
1 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
2 7.caf.96.04
condonation of 170 days delay in preferring the Appeal.
(K. K. TATED, J.)
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of a 170-day delay in filing an appeal is permitted given the applicant's explanation.
Whether sufficient cause was shown for condoning the delay in preferring the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manik Vishnu Bhatte
Bhagashri L. Ranganaiky
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
