The Court directed the transfer of a First Appeal valued under ten lakhs to the District Court, Sangli, relying on the Bombay Civil Court Act and a prior judgment, citing urgency regarding construction on the property.
Office directed to transfer the matter immediately to the District Court, Sangli.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
16.caf.1391.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1391 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 256 OF 2004
Shalan Mahadev Patil Versus Rajaram Shamrao Patil and others
....Applicant.
....Respondents.
Mrs. Leena Sawant i/b P. M. Pradhan for the Applicant. Mr. Mandar Limaye for the Respondent No. 6.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : MAY 9, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
parties.
1 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
2
16.caf.1391.12
Court, Sangli.
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a First Appeal valued at less than ten lakhs requires transfer to the District Court under Section 28-B of the Bombay Civil Court Act, 1869.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vitthal Ramchandra Mali and Others V/s. Laxmi Ganpati Mali and othersRelied on¶3
Vitthal Ramchandra Mali and Others V/s. Laxmi Ganpati Mali and others reported in 2006 (4) Bom. C. R. 31 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shalan Mahadev Patil
Rajaram Shamrao Patil
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
