This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
form
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.583 OF 2012
in
FIRST APPEAL NO.(ST) NO.2110 of 2012 with CIVIL APPLICATION NO.688 OF 2012 1. Bharat Singh Parmar & ors .. Applicants
vs
Jitendra G.Parmar & ors .. Respondents
Mr.G.A.Agarwal for Applicants
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR & N.M.JAMDAR, JJ DATE: 13th March, 2012.
P.C.
negotiating settlement terms. Similar position was reported on 27.2.2012. Once again adjournment is sought on the same ground. The respondents are not before the Court. In any case, as there is delay of 98 days in filing of the appeal against the decree passed by the trial Court in a suit for partition, we deem it proper to issue notice to the respondents returnable 4.4.2012. To be listed under caption “settlement.
N.M.JAMDAR, J A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application should be allowed to set aside a default and require service of notice on respondents who were not in court.
Bharat Singh Parmar & ors.
Jitendra G.Parmar & ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
N.M.JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court