The High Court of Bombay dismissed the applicant's civil application seeking final disposal of an appeal, holding that such consideration could not be undertaken at the time.
The civil application is dismissed as it cannot be considered for final disposal of the appeal at present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
15.caf.321.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 321 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2012
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ....Applicant. Versus Nurjahhan Habib Shaikh ....Respondent.
....Respondent.
Mr. Vinod Mahadik i/b. R. A. Malandkar for the Applicant.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. None for the Respondent though duly served.
the Applicant-Mumbai Municipal Corporation are illegal and are
S. S. MORMARE
1 of 2
2 15.caf.321.12
liable to be set aside and also for perpetual injunction to restrain the Applicant from acting upon the said order. The said suit was decreed by the Trial Court on 27th June, 2011 declaring that the impugned notice dated 24th May, 2007 and the consequential order dated 12th July, 2007 are illegal and bad in law and the Municipal Corporation is restrained from acting upon the same by way of writ of a permanent injunction.
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil application regarding final disposal of the appeal can be considered at that time.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Nurjahhan Habib Shaikh
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
