The High Court at Bombay allowed the applicant's application for condonation of 38 days delay in filing a first appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award, due to lack of respondent appearance.
Condonation of 38 days delay in preferring the First Appeal; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
22.caf.1317.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1317 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 6302 OF 2012
Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd. Versus
Anandi Jaganath Kadam and others
....Applicant.
....Respondents.
Mr. Alok Bhatt i/b S. R. Singh & Co. for the Applicant.
CORAM: K. K. TATED, J. DATED : AUGUST 23, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. Though the Respondents are duly served, no one appeared on their behalf when the matter was called out for hearing.
1 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
2
22.caf.1317.12
counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant and the averments made in the paragraph2 of the Civil Application, I am satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing the present application. The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus:
“(a) The delay of 38 days be condoned.”
2 of 2
S. S. MORMARE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the First Appeal by 38 days should be condoned.
Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd.
Anandi Jaganath Kadam
K. K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
