The applicant and respondent agreed to resolve the matrimonial dispute amicably. The court dispensed with party presence and adjourned the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6542 OF 2015 IN FCA/20/2013 WITH CA/9250/2014 IN FCA/20/2013
RAJESH ASHOKRAO BAVISKAR VERSUS KAVITA RAJESH BAVISKAR
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Surve Hemant Mr. H D Patil, Adv., for R/sole.
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: July 03, 2015
PER COURT :-
agp/-
Rajesh Ashokrao Baviskar
Kavita Rajesh Baviskar
R. M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
