High Court recalled an impugned order and restored the writ petition to the file on chronological order, giving applicants three weeks to remove office objections or face dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA No.8575/12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8575 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION ST. NO.17495 OF 2011
Tukaram s/o Bapurao Bhavar & ors.
..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr Pahilwan, Advocate holding for Mr R.V. Gore for the applicants; Mr S.G. Nandedkar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : August 14, 2012
P.C.
Heard.
2 CA No.8575/12
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
amj/ca8575.12
Tukaram s/o Bapurao Bhavar & ors.
The State of Mah. & ors.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
