Disposed
Anil Munnalal Agrawal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/7/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P.7.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 07 OF 2011
[Anil Munnalal Agrawal Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others]
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
andRegistrar’s
orders.
Shri Shrikant G. Kawade,Advocate holding for
Shri S.J.Salunke,Advocate for Petitioner
Shri S.K.Tambe,AGP for respondents no.1 to 3
...
CORAM: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND
SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 13.08.2012.
P.C.:
. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner
upon instructions states that due to passage
of time challenge is rendered infructuous.
The petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Sd/- Sd/-
[SUNIL P.DESHMUKH,J.] [B.P.DHARMADHIKARI,J.]
MTK
2 W.P.7.11 Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Anil Munnalal Agrawal
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court