Dismissed
Rajput Sanjay Narayansingh v. Mahda Aurangabad Throgh Chief Officer
Bombay HCWP/6/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Respondent held because affidavit stated no tenement available. Dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's Coram: B. R. Gavai, and
orders or directions Sunil P. Deshmukh, JJ.
and the Registrar's
orders.Date: 15.3.2012
cancellation of allotment of tenament in his favour. The
allotment was cancelled dueto nonpayment. Not only that,after cancellation, fresh bids were invited and now the said tenament isallottedtothirdparty.
thatno tenament isnowavailable.
(SunilP.Deshmukh,J.) (B.R.Gavai,J.) pnd/wp-6.12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the cancellation of tenement allotment on grounds of non-payment and subsequent fresh allotment to a third party should be allowed.
petitioner
respondent
Sunil P. Deshmukh
B. R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court