Court rejected bail application in a case alleging assault with incised cuts on the neck under Section 307 IPC. The court held that the liberty of the accused was misused, the victim survived, and disclosure delay did not affect the prosecution narrative.
Bail application rejected; accused remains in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ba910-12.sxw
1/2
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.910 OF 2012
Suraj Rafiq Ambekari. ...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent ---
Mr.Rahul S.Kate, for Applicant.
Mrs.A.T.Jhaveri, APP for State.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 20th July, 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned Counsel for applicant extensively. The
accused in custody has urged to release him on bail for the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC.
ba910-12.sxw
2/2
Pvr
informed that somebody cut her throat and smeared blood on her face. She was taken to the hospital. Subsequently, she has, on 18.2.2012, informed the police that it was a person known as Suraj whose photograph she has subsequently identified on 22.2.2012. She was hospitalised and later on discharged.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused should be released on bail in an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and right to life of the victim.
Whether the delay in disclosing the name of the accused to the police affects the prosecution case.
Suraj Rafiq Ambekari
The State of Maharashtra
K.U.Chandiwali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
