Disposed

Ansar Khan S/O Ibrahim Khan Pathan (in Jail) C/8030 v. State of Maharashtra through Secy Home Deptt Mantralya Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC21 Aug 2012APPW/85/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Application 85/2012, the Nagpur Bench allowed amendment of the Writ Petition. In CP 303/2012, the Notice was accepted and the petition was directed to be heard along with WP 272/2012.

What did the court decide?

Application for amendment allowed with time limit to carry it out; Notice issued to Advocate General; Petition to be heard joint with WP 272/2012.

Ansar Khan S/O Ibrahim Khan Pathan (in… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

1/2

¶2

21.08.wp.303.12

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.85/2012 IN

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 303 / 2012 (Ansar Khan s/o Ibrahim Khan Pathan vs. The State of Maharashtra and

¶5

others )

¶6

.................................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶7

Mr.Nityesh Samudre, Adv. for petitioner Mr T.A.Mirza, APP for respondent-State

¶8

CORAM : P.V.HARDAS & M.L.TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : 21^st August, 2012.

¶9

CRI.APPLICATION (APPW) NO. 85/2012:

¶10

By this Application, the applicant/petitioner seeks to amend the petition as per the proposed amendment disclosed in the Application.

¶11

We have heard Shri Nitesh Samudre, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri T.A. Mirza, learned APP for respondents and for the reasons stated in the Application, the Application is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to amend the Writ Petition. The amendment to be carried carried out within two weeks from today.

¶12

CRIMINAL WRIT PEITITION NO.303/2012

¶13

Heard Mr. Nitesh Samudre, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶14

Rule . Rule, returnable early.

¶15

Shri T.A.Mirza. learned Additional Public

¶16

2/2

¶17

21.08.wp.303.12

¶18

Prosecutor accepts notice of Rule.

¶19

Notice be issued to the Advocate General for State of Maharashtra, as per High Court (Appellate Side) Rules. This Petition be heard along with Writ Petition No.

¶20

272 /2012.

¶21

JUDGEJUDGE

¶22

sahare

Ansar Khan S/O Ibrahim Khan Pathan (in Jail) C/8030 v. State of Maharashtra through Secy Home Deptt Mantralya Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ansar Khan S/O Ibrahim Khan Pathan (in Jail) C/8030 v. State of Maharashtra through Secy Home Deptt Mantralya Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan S/O Yeshwant Nahatkar Vs the Deputy Charity Commissioner, Nagpur and 2 Others

Ramkisan S/O Goverdhan Dhurve Vs State of Maharashtra through Pso Salekasa Ps Gondia

Sham S/O Subhashrao Kase Vs State of Maharashtra through Ps Midc Nagpur

Mukesh Waman Bansod, Convict No C 5939 Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Secretary, Home Department and Another

Rajni D/O Krushnadatta Ukey Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary Deptt of Home Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

The Thakkargram Gruhanirman Housing Society Ltd. Nagpur through Ex Secy. Dd Chichghare and Another Vs Shri Krushna Pancham Khopde and Others