The High Court at Nagpur allowed a Criminal Application seeking amendment to a Criminal Writ Petition. The court permitted the petitioner to carry out the amendment within two weeks.
Application allowed; petitioner permitted to amend the Writ Petition as proposed within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Criminal Application [APPW] No. 143 of 2012
IN
Criminal Writ Petition No. 443 of 2012
[Sunil G. Mishra Vs. State of Mah. & others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Sunil Mishra, Petitioner-in-Person.
Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP for respondents.
CORAM: P.V. HARDAS AND
A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : 08th October, 2012.
Bythisapplication,the
applicant/petitioner seeks to amend the
petition as per the proposed amendment
disclosed in the application.
We have heard the petitioner who appears
in person and the learned APP, and for the
reasons stated in the application, the
2
application is allowed and the petitioner is
permitted to amend the Writ Petition as per the
proposed amendment. Amendment be carried out
within two weeks from today.
JudgeJudge
|Hedau|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner to amend the Criminal Writ Petition as per the proposed amendment.
Sunil Mishra
State of Mah.
P.V. Hardas
A.P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court