Disposed
Nitin Bhaurao Tidke and 6 Oths v. State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O. Akot
Bombay HCAPPP/564/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRI.APPLICATION (APPP) NO.564 OF 2012 IN CRI. APPLICATION (APL) No.343 / 2012.
Nitin Bhaurao Tidke and ors. ..vs.. The State of Mah. through PSO, Akola.
=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram Court's or Judges Order appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mr.R.M.Patwardhan,Adv. for the applicants. Mr.A.S.Sonare, APP for the respondent 1.
C ORAM: P.V.HARDAS AND
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ. DATED : 25th SEPTEMBER, 2012.
By this application, the applicants seeks leave of this court for filing certain documents on record.
We have heard Shri Patwardhan, learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and permission as sought for is granted.
JUDGE JUDGE.
chute
2
Nitin Bhaurao Tidke and ors.
The State of Mah. through PSO, Akola
P.V. Hardas
A.P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court