Disposed
Vijay @ Pappu Dinkar Tandle v. the State of Mah
Bombay HCAPPLN/811/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CriApln811/12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No. 811 of 2012
( Vijay @ Pappu Dinkar Tandle v. The State )
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court's CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J.
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Mr. N.S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the
applicant
Mr.S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for the respondent /
State
1. Heard.
2.At the end of hearing, learned Advocate
for the applicant restricts the prayer for
expediting the trial.
3.Considering the fact that the accused
is in jail, this Court directs as under :
(a)The applicant is at liberty to move an
application for early hearing before the
learned Sessions Judge.
(b)If such an application is moved,
learned Sessions Judge shall give reasonable
priority for hearing and disposal of the
trial.
2
CriApln811/12
4. This application is disposed of.
( A. H. JOSHI, J. )
Date : 06/03/2012
SRM/
Vijay @ Pappu Dinkar Tandle
The State
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court