Allowed

Vilas Asaram Gaikwad and Ors. v. the State of Mah

Bombay HC6 Mar 2012APPLN/776/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the court allowed withdrawal for applicants No. 1 and No. 2. It granted bail to applicant No. 3 on a personal and surety bond of Rs. 20,000, noting no specific overt acts against her.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw application for applicants No. 1 and 2; grant of bail to applicant No. 3 on personal and surety bond of Rs. 20,000.

Vilas Asaram Gaikwad and Ors. Vs the State of Mah — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

CriApln776/12

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 776 OF 2012

¶6

1. Vilas s/o Asaram Gaikwad Applicants

¶7

2. Karbhari s/o Asaram Gaikwad

¶8

3. Balubai @ Janabai w/o Asaram Gaikwad

¶9

 V E R S U S

¶10

 The State of Maharashtra

¶11

Respondent

¶12

 Shri R.A. Tambe, Advocate for the applicants
Shri R.P. Phatke, A.P.P. for the respondent/State

¶13

 CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
 DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2012

¶14

PER COURT :

¶15

1.Learned A.P.P. states on instructions that the

¶16

investigation would be completed within a week’s time and the
charge-sheet would be filed on or before 16th March, 2012.

¶17

2.Learned Advocate for the applicants prays for

¶18

permission to withdraw the application to the extent of
applicant No. 1 Vilas s/o Asaram Gaikwad and applicant No. 2

¶19

Karbhari s/o Asaram Gaikwad with liberty to move an
application for bail before the learned Sessions Judge. In

¶20

view of this request, permission to withdraw this application

¶21

to the extent of above two applicants is granted with liberty,

¶22

2 CriApln776/12

¶23

as prayed.

¶24

3.Prayer for grant of bail is pursued to the extent of
applicant No. 3 Balubai @ Janabai only.

¶25

4.Heard both sides. Perused the case-diary.

¶26

5.As regards the role of applicant No.3 Balubai @
Janabai w/o Asaram Gaikwad is concerned, it is prima facie
seen, that there are no specific overt acts attributed to her.

¶27

6.In this background, this application is allowed in
terms of prayer clause ’B’ so far as applicant No. 3 Balubai @
Janabai w/o Asaram Gaikwad is concerned. She shall furnish
personal bond and surety bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Thousand).

¶28

SRM/6/3/12

Vilas Asaram Gaikwad and Ors. v. the State of Mah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vilas Asaram Gaikwad and Ors. v. the State of Mah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangameshwar Laxman Sontakke and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Vinod Soma Malche (Bhil) and Anr. Vs the State of Mah

Shrinath Haribhau Ghadge Vs the State of Mah

Kalyan Bhimrao Shiketode and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Anr.

Shivaji Pandurang Pakhare Vs the State of Mah

Vijay @ Pappu Dinkar Tandle Vs the State of Mah