The High Court of Bombay Bench Aurangabad allowed Criminal Application No.780 of 2012 in terms of the prayer clause (B) in an appeal against conviction.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri. Application 780 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.780 of 2012 In Criminal Appeal No.358 of 2000
Ganesh s/o Nagnath Boinwad. .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
Shri. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for applicant.
Smt.V.A. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 24th FEBRUARY 2012
PER COURT :
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
Ganesh s/o Nagnath Boinwad
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
