Disposal of two Criminal Applications after the Additional Public Prosecutor confirmed that the police had filed a charge sheet regarding the offences which were the subject matter of the main application.
The Registry to forward copy of this order to the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri. Application 69 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Criminal Application No.69 of 2012 In Criminal Application No.4929 of 2011 In Criminal Application No.3553 of 2006
Balasaheb Bapurao Choure .. Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Another. .. Respondents.
Shri. Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate, for the applicant.
Shri. S.D. Kaldate, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE 9th FEBRUARY 2012
PER COURT :
2 Cri. Application 69 of 2012
Nandkishore Kasture. Learned counsel Shri. Jadhavar submitted that by an order dated 19th October 2011, Criminal Application No.3553 of 2006 came to be dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared for the applicant when the matter was called out. Rule was discharged and interim relief was vacated.
3 Cri. Application 69 of 2012
charge sheet has already been filed, we are of the view that the applications could be disposed of.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Applications Nos. 69 of 2012 and 4929 of 2011 should be disposed of after the charge sheet was filed.
Balasaheb Bapurao Choure
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana Nandkishore Kasture
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
