Applicants moved for review and condonation of delay. The court held the review application lacked merit as it sought only reappreciation and granting leave was denied, dismissing the applications.
Civil Application No. 911/2012 and Review Application no. 33755/2011 were dismissed with no merits found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 911 OF 2012 WITH RAST/33755/2011 I N W.P.NO.648/2011
Malti Kamlakar Deshpande and Anr.
Applicants.
VERSUS
The Union of India and others.
Respondents.
... Mr. Surti Zainab M.Advocate for Applicant Mr. J R Shah Advocate for respondent ...
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. Dated: February 08, 2012
=====
PER COURT :-
( T.V. NALAWADE, J. ) ( NARESH H. PATIL,J. )
A3
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Review Application possesses merit and whether the delay in filing Civil Application No. 911/2012 should be condoned.
Whether the death of the first applicant impacts the measurability of the Review Application regarding reappreciation of the matter.
Whether the grounds raised in Review Application no. 33755/2011 are acceptable to the court.
Malti Kamlakar Deshpande and Anr.
The Union of India and others
Naresh H. Patil
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
