The High Court condensed the delay in filing a Criminal Appeal (appealed against an order in a Criminal Application) and disposed of the pending application.
The delay in filing the Appeal was condoned and the Application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra5720.11
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5720 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO.685 OF 2011
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri. U.B.Bilolikar Advocate for
Applicant.
Smt. V.A. Shinde, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.
Shri. Satyajit S. Bora Advocate for
Resp. Nos. 2 to 8.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 13TH MARCH, 2012.
1. Heard. For the reasons stated in
the Application and considering the
submissions advanced, the delay in filing
the Appeal is condoned. The Application
is disposed of.
asb/MAR12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the Appeal warrants condonation.
Applicant
Resp. No.1
Resp. Nos. 2 to 8
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court