This order concerns a criminal application for condoning delay in filing an appeal; it is a dispositional order.
No further relief; the matter was disposed of within this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra728.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.728 OF 2012 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO.77 OF 2012
OfficeNotes,Office Court’s or Judge’s Orders
MemorandaofCoram,
appearances,Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Shri.S.G. Ladda Advocate for Applicant.
Shri.V.D. Rakh, A.P.P. for Respondent.
....
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 12TH MARCH, 2012.
1. Heard. For the reasons stated in
the Application and after considering the
submissions advanced, the delay in filing
the Appeal is condoned. The Application
is disposed of.
[T.V. NALAWADE,J.] [NARESH H. PATIL,J.]
asb/MAR12
Applicant
Respondent
NARESH H. PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court