Swapnil Machindra Kale v. the State of Mah
Case brief
What is this about?
Applications were dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant's counsel after hearing. The court directed expedited trial given the applicants' incarceration.
Applications were dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant's counsel after hearing. The court directed expedited trial given the applicants' incarceration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cran525.12
2
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 525 OF 2012 (Swapnil Machindra Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra) WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1127 OF 2012 (Pravin Brahmadev Shinde Vs. State of Maharashtra)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : A.H. JOSHI, J.
Mr. S.N. Patil h/f Mr. N.V. Gaware, Advocate for the applicant in application No. 525 of 2012
Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, advocate for applicant in application No.1127 of 2012
Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
(A.H.JOSHI, J.)
Date : 27/03/2012
rlj
cran525.12
2
Swapnil Machindra Kale
Pravin Brahmadev Shinde
State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court