The bench allowed the applicant to withdraw Criminal Application No. 4343/2011 upon instructions from counsel, due to a desire for an amicable settlement with the respondent.
Leave to withdraw the application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4343/2011
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri P.S. Koshti h/f Shri Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant. Shri N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent / State.
Shri R.G. Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : U. D. SALVI, J.
DATED : 26th March, 2012
applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application. He submits that the applicant and the contesting respondent No.2 – the complainant wish to settle the issues between them amicably and therefore, withdrawal of the present application is felt necessary.
(U.D. SALVI, J. )
ts k/
P.S. Koshti
State
U. D. SALVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
