Bhaiyya Subhash Panpatil v. the State of Mah
Bombay HCAPPLN/427/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In an expedited criminal appeal from a conviction, the single-judge bench observed that the victim's age as a minor precludes a consent defense, dismissed the bail application, and allowed expedited hearing of the appeal rather than disposing of the matter. (2012)
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
appln427.12
¶2
1
¶3
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶5
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 427 OF 2012
¶6
Office Notes, Office |_________________________________________________________________________________
Memoranda of Coram, |
appearances, Court's |
orders or | Court's or Judge's Orders
directions and |
Registrar's orders |
¶7
_________________________________________________________________________________
¶8
Shri R.S. Shinde holding the brief of Shri
N.L. Choudhari, advocate for applicant.
SmtY.M.Kshirsagar,A.P.P.for
respondent/State.
¶9
.....
CORAM : A.M. THIPSAY, J.
Date : 2nd March, 2012.
¶10
P.C. :
¶11
Heard.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Applicant
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
A.M. Thipsay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court