Vaibhav Balasaheb Solanke v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
This single judge order confirmed interim anticipatory bail granted to an applicant in a money-laundering case. The court imposed conditions requiring daily police reporting for a week and written intimation of address changes, noting that detention was unnecessary for investigation.
What did the court decide?
Confirmed interim anticipatory bail on conditions of daily reporting and intimation of address change.
What the court decided
cran259.12
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 259 OF 2012
Vaibhav s/o Balasaheb Solanke ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
...Respondents
Mr. S.S. Tope h/f Mr. V.D. Salunke, advocate for the applicant Mr. T.S. Lodhe, APP for respondents
CORAM : A.M. THIPSAY, J.
- DATED : 1ST MARCH, 2012
ORAL ORDER :-
- 1 Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the respondents.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant should be confirmed subject to appropriate conditions given the availability of funds returned to the bank.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vaibhav s/o Balasaheb Solanke
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra and another
Coram
A.M. THIPSAY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court