This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.290 OF 2012
Madhav Sambhaji Gaikwad
Applicant
V E R S U S
The state of Maharashtra
Respondent
Shri P.R. Adkine, Advocate for the applicant
Shri S.B. Pulkundwar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
CORAM : A. H. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2012
PER COURT :
1. Heard.
2. Perused the case-diary.
3.At the close of hearing, learned Advocate for the
applicant prays for permission to withdraw the application.
Application is allowed to be withdrawn. Application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
( A. H. JOSHI, J. )
SRM/
Madhav Sambhaji Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
A. H. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court