None. This order is a procedural stipulation regarding the filing of a second set of documents; no substantive legal proposition or disposal is articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2884 OF 2008
Mohammad Ayub Taj Mohammad Makarani
& others
...APPLICANTS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
& others
...RESPONDENTS
.....
ShriS.U. Choudhari, Advocate for applicants
Smt.Y.M. Kshirsagar , A.P.P. for respondent/ State
ShriG.A. Nagori, Advocate for respondent No. 3
.....
CORAM:A.H. JOSHI AND
U.D. SALVI, JJ.
DATED:27th September, 2012
O R D E R:
1.Learned Advocate for the applicants
undertakes to file second set within two weeks. If the
second set is filed within two weeks, matter to
proceed. If the second set is not filed within
stipulated period, matter shall stand dismissed without
further reference to the Court.
SDM* September-2012 Cri. 2884.2008
Mohammad Ayub Taj Mohammad Makarani & others
The State of Maharashtra & others
A.H. Joshi
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court