Criminal application regarding stay application where trial had begun; court discharged the rule without granting interim relief.
Discharged the rule; no interim relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.appln.1448/04
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1448/2004
Rajkumar Omprakash Basin.
...Applicant..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.
...Respondent...
.....
Shri B.R. Warma, Advocate for applicant.
Smt.V.A. Shinde, APP for respondent - State.
.....
CORAM: A.H. JOSHI &
U.D. SALVI, JJ.
DATE: 26.09.2012
ORDER :
1]In this case, this Court had issued notice on
6.7.2004. Rule was issued on 05.8.2004. Interim relief
by way of stay was not granted.
2]Learned Advocate Shri B.R. Warma states that the
- 2 -
Cr.appln.1448/04
charge-sheet is filed and the trial has begun.
3]In view of above, we discharge the Rule.
(U.D. SALVI, J.) (A.H. JOSHI, J.)
ndk/cr2691214
Rajkumar Omprakash Basin
The State of Maharashtra
A.H. Joshi
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court