The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of the criminal writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate legal remedy at a later stage.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach competent court at appropriate time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.305 OF 2012
Krishnakumar s/o Baburao Kulkarni
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
Sumedha w/o Sunil Chitpur (Shinde) @
Sumedha d/o Vithalrao Shinde& anr....RESPONDENTS
.....
Shri Amit Deshpande, Advocate holding for
Shri R.P. Adgaonkar, Advocate for petitioner
Mrs. V.A. Shinde, A.P.P. for State
.....
DATED: 25th September, 2012
O R D E R :
1.In the midst of hearing, learned Advocate for
the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the
petition with liberty to take recourse to remedy as
available in law at appropriate time.
2.Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty as sought.
fmp/cri4222.12
Krishnakumar s/o Baburao Kulkarni
Sumedha w/o Sunil Chitpur (Shinde)
anr.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court