In a criminal application under Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, the High Court of Bombay quashed pending criminal proceedings following a settlement confirmed between the applicant and the respondent in a company petition.
Criminal application allowed; pending Criminal Case No.3930/S/2002 quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln1087-10.sxw
1/2
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1087 OF 2010
Mr.Sitaram C.Ghandat …Applicant versus 1.Mr.Niranjan B.Shah & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.M.K.Kocharekar, for Applicant.
Mr.S.M.Kalyankar i/b. A.H.H.Ponda, for Respondent no.1.
Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP for State.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 6th November, 2012
P.C. :
Heard Mr.Kocharekar, the learned Counsel for applicant (original accused), Mr.Kalyankar h/f. Mr.A.H.H.Ponda, the learned Counsel for original complainant-respondent no.1.
appln1087-10.sxw
2/2
Pvr
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings can be quashed following a settlement recorded in a compromise petition.
Sitaram C. Ghandat
Niranjan B. Shah
K.U.Chandiwali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
