The learned advocate for the applicants stated that they desired to withdraw the application, which was accordingly dismissed with no costs.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APL553.2012.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Criminal Application (APL) No. 553of 2012
Bhagwan Jaikisan Bhattad and two others
V/s.
State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Umarkhed, Tah. Umarkhed, Distt. Yavatmal and another
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Shri V. N. Patre, Advocate for the Petitioners Shri T. A. Mirza, APP for the Respondent No. 1
CORAM : P. V. HARDAS & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATED : OCTOBER 3, 2012.
Shri V. N. Patre, learned Advocate for the
applicants states on instructions that the applicants may be permitted to withdraw this application.
Application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Punde
Bhagwan Jaikisan Bhattad and two others
State of Maharashtra
P. V. Hardas
A. P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
