Disposed

Mahadeo Latari Nagbhidkar and 2 Oths v. State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O. Gadchandur and Anr.

Bombay HC26 Apr 2012APL/335/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution allowing the petitioner to file a fresh application exclusively under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The matter was closed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file application exclusively under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

Mahadeo Latari Nagbhidkar and 2 Oths Vs State… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.335 of 2011.

¶4

Mahadeo Latari Nagbhidkar and others
...Versus...

¶5

State of Mah. thro. PSO P.S. Gadchandur, Dist. Chandrapur and another

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Mr. Apurv De, Adv. for applicants.
Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP for respondent no.1.
Mr. R.D. Bhuibhar, Adv. for respondent no.2.

¶8

CORAM: A.H. JOSHI AND
 SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 26.04.2012.

¶9

This is a petition under Article 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India.

¶10

The learned Counsel for the applicant states that
he wants to file appropriate application exclusively
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with liberty to avail the
remedies as available in law.

¶11

The application is disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty to file application exclusively under Section
482 of Cr.P.C.

¶12

JudgeJudge

¶13

NSN

Mahadeo Latari Nagbhidkar and 2 Oths v. State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O. Gadchandur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahadeo Latari Nagbhidkar and 2 Oths v. State of Mah. Thr. P.S.O. Gadchandur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Maharashtra Thr Chief Conservator of Forests Regional Vs Subodh Kumar S/O Amin Ozha

Kisan S/O Hiralal Motwani Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary Home Department and Others

Ramchandra Akaram Solankhe C- 3008 Vs the Dvisional Commissioner, Amravati Division Amravati and Another

Ukarda Waman Thakre (in Jail) Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Amdapur

Satish Ramchandra Nirapure C-7799 Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secy Home Deptt Mumbai and Another

Shri Gurucharan S/O Jagadambaprasad Yadav and Another Vs State of Maharashtra through Pso Ps Yashodhara Nagar