Criminal appeal filed against conviction and sentence. The High Court set aside the lower court judgment, acquitting the appellants of specific offences under the IPC, and remanded the case for trial of absconding accused.
Appellants acquitted of offences under Sections 395, 397 and 457 IPC; case remanded to trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cria68.00
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2000
Jilaniya S/o Janglya Bhosale and others.
....Appellants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
....Respondent.
Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, advocate for appellant no.2. Mr. S.J. Salunke, advocate for appellant no.3. Mr. R.P. Phatke, APP for respondent.
CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 22nd June, 2012.
OPERATIVE ORDER
cria68.00
2
of absconding accused and it is to be preserved.
[ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ]
sga/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment and order convicting the appellants for offences under Sections 395, 397 and 457 IPC should be set aside.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jilaniya S/o Janglya Bhosale and others
The State of Maharashtra
T. V. NALAWADE
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
