The applicant sought to withdraw the criminal application while directing the trial court to expedite the trial. The application was disposed of as withdrawn.
The application was disposed of as withdrawn; the Sessions Court was directed to expedite the trial and dispose of the case within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appln2055.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2055 OF 2012 ( Sunil Ramaji Salve V/s State of Maharashtra )
| Office Notes, |
Off | ice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda of | Cora |
m, |
|
| appearances, orders or directio Registrar’s orders |
Cou ns |
rt’s and |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| Mr. V.S. Badakh, advocate for the applicant. Mr. N.H. Borade, APP for respondent/State. |
|||
| CORAM : T. V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 21stJune, 2012. |
|||
| PER COURT : | |||
| 1. Advocate for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application and he submitted that the |
|||
| directions be given to the trial Court to expedite the | |||
| trial. Application is disposed of as withdrawn. The Sessions Court is directed to expeditiously dispose of |
|||
| the case and in any case, within three months from the date of receipt of this order. |
|||
| [ T. V. NALAWADE, J. ] sga/ |
Sunil Ramaji Salve
State of Maharashtra
T. V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
