The High Court held that the appellant, Vijaykumar Narayan Yemul, had expired as confirmed by the learned Advocate for the appellant, and the Criminal Appeal disposed of as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APEAL 360 OF 2000
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.360 OF 2000
Vijaykumar Narayan Yemul
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mrs. Veena B. Thadani with Mr. Vishal B. Thadani and Mrs. Sangeeta Thakkar, for the Appellant
Mrs. S. V. Sonawane, APP for the Respondent – State
CORAM : R.C.CHAVAN, J. DATE : 16th July, 2012
P.C.
The appellant is stated to have expired. Learned
APP confirmed this. Appeal is, therefore, disposed of as abated.
(R.C.CHAVAN, J.)
Vijaykumar Narayan Yemul
The State of Maharashtra
R.C. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
