In Criminal Appeal No. 351 of 2011, the High Court of Bombay recorded the death certificate of Respondent No. 2. The court held the appeal had abated due to the death of a party and disposed of the matter without hearing.
The appeal was held to have abated and stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APEAL-351.2011
sjs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.351 OF 2011
Ghanshyam Mohanlal Parmar.... Appellant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
Anr..... Respondents
Shri Jaydev Trivedi for the Appellant.
Ms V.S. Mhaispurkar, APP, for the State.
Shri Rishi Bhuta for Respondent No.2.
DATED: JULY 18, 2012
P.C:
Not on board. By consent, taken up for
hearing.
The learned counsel for the appellant
states that respondent No.2 has expired. The
learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2
has also tendered a copy of the death
certificate. The same is taken on record. In
view of this, the appeal abates and accordingly
stands disposed of.
Ghanshyam Mohanlal Parmar
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court