This court rejected an application for anticipatory bail. The applicant faced prosecution for offences under sections 147, 148, 302 PC read with section 149 IPC. The court held the applicant played a lead role and no case was made out for bail.
The application for anticipatory bail was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
11.10.aba.399.12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.399 /2012
(Rajesh s/o Narayandas Lohana vs. State of Maharashtra )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri Jaiswal, Adv. for applicant Shri D.B.Patel, APP for Respondent -State
CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : 11th October, 2012.
Heard.
The applicant is apprehending his arrest for the offence punishable under sections 147, 147, 148 and 302 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.
The applicant appears to have played a lead role in the offence. The FIR is very clear as regards the allegations against the applicant.
No case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. The Application stands rejected.
JUDGE
sahare
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to an applicant apprehending arrest for rioting, endangering life, and murder offences?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh s/o Narayandas Lohana
State of Maharashtra
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court