Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VBC 1 wp985.11-8.6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.985 OF 2011
M/s.Parul Builders and Developers. ..Petitioner. versus
Union of India & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr.Suresh Dubey i/b. Mr.Vishal V.Jain and Mr.Prashant D.Jadhav for the Petitioner.
Mr.Nikhil Mengde i/b. Thakore Jariwala & Asso. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA , JJ.
June 8, 2011.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave
to withdraw the Petition. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( Anoop V. Mohta, J.)
M/s.Parul Builders and Developers
Union of India & Ors.
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
