Two writ petitions challenging retirement age enhancement conditions were disposed of by reference to a common judgment in connected Writ Petition No. 2093 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
aswp-8688-8689-11
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8688 OF 2011
Walke Eknath Ramkrishna
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Higher & Technical Education and ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 8689 OF 2011
Pingale Shivaji Baburao .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Department of Higher & Technical Education and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. C.R. Sadasivan with Mr. N.M. Ganguli for petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
NOVEMBER 24, 2011.
P.C.
2
aswp-8688-8689-11
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
Walke Eknath Ramkrishna
Pingale Shivaji Baburao
State of Maharashtra
B. H. Marlapalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
