The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the non-appointment of the petitioner to a reserved position. The court held that since recruitment and appointments were completed before a relevant Full Bench judgment and the selection list expired, reopening the issue is unreasonable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P. No.8372 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Writ Petition No.8372 of 2009
Vijaylaxmi D/o Ganpatrao Jadhav. .. Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others. .. Respondents.
Shri. H.I. Pathan, Advocate, for petitioner.
Shri. D.R. Korde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent No.1 to 3.
Shri. G.R. Ingole, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Shri. S.R. Choukidar, Advocate, for respondent No.13.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ.
DATE : 20th DECEMBER 2011
PER COURT :
advertisement No.1/2009 wherein 14 posts were reserved
for candidates belonging to Project Affected category. The petitioner was candidate at Sr.No.9. Seven candidates
were given appointment orders. Respondent No.13 -
2 W.P. No.8372 of 2009
Yadav Kalba Bodkhe was directed to be appointed on the remaining post consequent to the order passed by the Grievance Committee.
3 W.P. No.8372 of 2009
petition is dismissed.
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Zilla Parishad Nanded recruitment to posts reserved for project affected category undertaken prior to the Full Bench judgment should be reopened.
Whether the petitioner, ranked second, is entitled to appointment when the candidate above him joined another post.
If the selection process and appointments are already finalized, whether the petition challenging the merits has any merit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajendra Pandurang Pagare v. State of MaharashtraDistinguished¶23
Rajendra Pandurang Pagare v. State of Maharashtra, 2009(4) Bom.C.R. 928 · Who else cites this
Vijaylaxmi D/o Ganpatrao Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
Yadav Kalba Bodkhe
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
