Held that no interference is warranted regarding Government Resolutions applicable only after the petitioner's retirement. The writ petition was dismissed on 19/12/2011.
Writ Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp5608-11.odt
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGBAD.
Office notes, office Memoranda of | coram, appearance, court’s orders | or directions and Registrar’s orders |
| Court’s or Judge’s orders.
|
WRIT PETITION NO.5608/11
Digambar Pralhad Choudhari
Vs
The State of Maha. & ors.
...
Shri Vishnu Dhoble,Adv.for
petitioner
Shri D.R.Korde,AGP for State.
CORAM : NARESH H.PATIL &
T.V.NALAWADE,JJ.
DATE : 19/12/2011.
1]Heard.
2] Shri Vishnu Dhoble,Adv.for
petitioner submits that in
facttheGovernment
Resolutions dated 1/1/11 and
25/2/11, if applied to the
petitioner's case, then the
petitioner could have served
for a longer period that is
upto 65 years of age. The
wp5608-11.odt
2
petitioner admittedly retired
on attaining superannuation at
the age of 60 years in January
2011.
3]In view of the facts of
thecase,Government
Resolution which has taken
effect after the retirement of
thepetitioner,no
interference is warranted in
exercise of extra ordinary
writ jurisdiction. Writ
Petition is dismissed.
(T.V.NALAWADE,J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.)
umg/wp5608-11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ court can interfere with Government Resolutions that took effect after the petitioner's retirement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Digambar Pralhad Choudhari
The State of Maha. & ors.
NARESH H.PATIL
T.V.NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court