In this Writ Petition filed in September 2011 to challenge an Industrial Court order dismissing a revision petition against a Labour Court order granting reinstatement with 50% back wages, the High Court dismissed the writ petition.
The Writ Petition is dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 8162.2011
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8162 OF 2011
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. DATE : 23/11/2011.
Mr. P.V.Barde, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. B.B.Yenge, Advocate for the respondent.
PER COURT :
2 WP 8162.2011
have concurrently concluded on the finding of fact. No perversity is observed and more particularly in view of the laches on the part of the petitioner, I am not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition.
2. The Writ Petition as such is dismissed. No costs.
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ]
KNP/WP 8162.2011
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the dismissal of a revision and confirmation of Labour Court orders should be entertained despite inordinate delay and laches on the petitioner's part
Petitioner
Respondent
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
