In this writ petition seeking review of a remand order by the Additional Collector, the Court held that pending civil proceedings prevent revenue authorities from deciding the property dispute. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed without interference.
The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 7693.2011
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7693 OF 2011
Office Notes,Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of .......................... Coram,appearances, Court's orders or CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J. directions and Registrar's orders DATE : 23/11/2011. Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K.B.Choudhari, Addl. Govt. Pleader for State.
PER COURT :
2 WP 7693.2011
[ S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J. ] KNP/WP 7693.2011
2 issues framed by the court
whether the writ petition merits interference despite the existence of pending civil proceedings.
whether the Additional Collector erred in remanding the matter to the Tahsildar for fresh enquiry.
Petitioner
State
S.V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
