High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 8029 of 2011 as infructuous due to intervening events, reserving the petitioner's right to initiate further proceedings to challenge the election.
Disposed of as infructuous; right to initiate further election challenge proceedings reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8029 OF 2011
Nilesh Sonba Dhanavle
... Petitioner
v/s
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
... Respondents
Mr.Balasaheb R. Deshmukh for the petitioner.
Ms.M.S.Bane, “B” Panel Counsel for respondent State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: 14TH OCTOBER, 2011
P.C.:
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
2
3
Nilesh Sonba Dhanavle
The State of Maharashtra
B.H.Marlappalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court