The Bombay High Court rejected a writ petition summarily, holding that identical grounds were already rejected in Writ Petition No. 7745 of 2011 on the same day.
None granted; petition rejected summarily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
aswp-7741-11
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7741 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Petitioners
Vs.
Chitra Dadarao Naik and ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. A.B. Vagyani, AGP for Petitioners-State.
CORAM: B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
OCTOBER 13, 2011.
P.C.
For the reasons set out in our order passed today in Writ Petition No. 7745 of 2011, this petition also must fail at the threshold.
Hence, the petition is rejected summarily.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B. H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
Chitra Dadarao Naik and ors.
B. H. Marlapalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
