Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR in a criminal writ petition. The court dismissed the petitions on the ground that a chargesheet had already been filed, making the challenge to the FIR inapplicable.
Petitions dismissed; no order passed on quashment of FIR as chargesheet already filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PPD
1
8.WPS774&775-05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.774 OF 2005
Lalit Somdatta Nagpal. ..Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.775 OF 2005
Anil Somdatta Nagpal. ..Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr.Amin Solkar, Advocate for the Petitioners in both Petitions. Mr.Raja Thakare, Special Public Prosecutor a/w. Ms.M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for the State in both Petitions.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 11TH JANUARY, 2011.
P.C.
the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kolhapur in respect of C.R. No.
2
8.WPS774&775-05
39 of 2004. The same is registered as R.C.C. No.288 of 2005. If so, the question of proceeding with the challenge to the FIR does not arise. Petitions accordingly fail and the same deserve to be dismissed. Hence, both the Writ Petitions are dismissed.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(A. M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
Lalit Somdatta Nagpal
Anil Somdatta Nagpal
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. KHANWILKAR
A.R. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
